Veteran lyricist and screenwriter Javed Akhtar has defended films often labelled as “propaganda,” stating that all cinema carries ideas and viewpoints, and questioning the validity of using the term in a negative sense. His remarks came during an award function in Kolkata, where he also expressed admiration for director Aditya Dhar’s Dhurandhar, a film that has been at the centre of similar debates since its release.

Akhtar, known for his outspoken views on cinema and society, said he does not fully understand what is meant by “propaganda films.” He argued that every film, regardless of genre or theme, reflects a certain ideology or perspective, and that storytelling inherently involves taking a stand. According to him, the presence of a viewpoint does not automatically reduce a film’s artistic or narrative value.

He further stated that filmmakers have every right to present their ideas through cinema, adding that the responsibility of a filmmaker is to portray what they consider truthfully, even if it is expressed through fictional or stylised storytelling. Akhtar emphasised that ideology is an unavoidable element of storytelling, whether in realistic drama or even fantasy-based narratives.

Also Read: Veteran Actor Sudesh Kumar Dies at 95 Following Brain Stroke in Mumbai

Speaking specifically about Dhurandhar, Akhtar praised the film and said he thoroughly enjoyed watching it, particularly the first part of the narrative. His comments come at a time when the film continues to be discussed in public discourse for its political undertones and narrative framing, which some critics have described as leaning toward a particular ideological viewpoint.

Directed by Aditya Dhar, Dhurandhar is a spy thriller featuring Ranveer Singh as an Indian intelligence operative based in Karachi. The film, released in December, emerged as both a critical and commercial success, reportedly grossing over ₹1300 crore worldwide. Its concluding sequel performed even better at the box office, crossing ₹1000 crore in India and earning nearly ₹1800 crore globally.

However, the film has also faced criticism from sections of audiences and commentators who argue that it portrays contemporary political themes in a selective manner, allegedly highlighting certain narratives while downplaying others. This has led to it being described by some as a “propaganda film,” though the filmmakers have not publicly responded to these allegations.

Akhtar’s remarks add a fresh dimension to the ongoing debate around ideology in cinema, where lines between storytelling, creative expression, and political interpretation continue to be contested. His statement reinforces the view that films, by their very nature, often reflect the worldview of their creators, whether intentionally or otherwise.

Also Read: Ruby Bhatia Opens Up On Leaving Fame For Spiritual Path At 18