The Supreme Court sharply criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for its involvement in politically sensitive cases, dismissing its appeal against the Karnataka High Court’s decision to quash the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) case involving BM Parvati, wife of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. The bench, led by Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, cautioned the ED against being used as a tool in political battles, with the CJI stating, “Let political battles be fought before the electorate. Why are you being used?”

Chief Justice Gavai warned Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, representing the ED, saying, “Don’t compel us to open our mouths, or we will be forced to make harsh comments about the ED.” Drawing from his experience in Maharashtra, he urged the agency to avoid perpetuating “violence” through its actions nationwide. The court upheld the Karnataka High Court’s ruling, effectively dismissing the case against Parvati.

The verdict underscores growing judicial concerns over the ED’s role in political matters, reinforcing the need for impartiality and electoral accountability in resolving disputes, setting a significant precedent for future cases.

Also Read: SC Halts Contempt Case Against Union Minister HD Kumaraswamy in Land Grab Dispute

Also Read: Supreme Court Demands UP Govt’s Response on Controversial Anti-Conversion Law