A controversial umpiring decision involving India batter Vihaan Malhotra and England bowler Farhan Ahmed became one of the most debated moments of the ICC Under-19 World Cup 2026 final, adding to England’s frustration in a match already dominated by India’s batting. The caught-and-bowled appeal, initially given out on the field, was overturned by the third umpire after a review, leaving England stunned and fans divided.

The incident occurred when Farhan Ahmed dived sharply to his left in his follow-through and appeared to complete a clean return catch. The on-field umpire ruled Malhotra out, and the batter began to walk off. However, the third umpire intervened, examined multiple replay angles, and ultimately reversed the decision, ruling Malhotra not out. The call shifted momentum further in India’s favor during an already one-sided final.

Under the Laws of Cricket, a catch is not deemed complete merely at first contact with the ball. The act of making a catch begins when the ball first touches the fielder and only ends when the fielder has full control of both the ball and their own movement. This distinction becomes crucial in diving or tumbling efforts, where balance and motion are still in progress after the initial grab.

Also Read: 2026 U19 World Cup Final: Suryavanshi's Fury — 175 Onslaught Drives India U19 to Record 411/9

Crucially, the law also states that the ground must not assist the fielder in completing the catch. While a hand touching the ground does not automatically invalidate a catch, the ball itself must not touch or be pressed against the turf while the fielder is still regaining balance or rising. If the ball is used to steady the body before control is fully established, the catch is considered incomplete.

In this case, the third umpire appeared to focus on the moments after Ahmed’s initial grab, particularly whether the ball made contact with the ground while he was still in motion. Although the effort looked spectacular in real time, replays suggested the catch was not completed under the strict technical definition of the law.

The decision left England aggrieved, feeling the athleticism deserved a wicket. However, under ICC playing conditions and the Laws of Cricket, such judgments hinge on precise technical criteria rather than visual impact, leaving England with little recourse but to accept the ruling.

Also Read: India U19 Dominate: Malhotra's Century Sets Up Big Win Over Zimbabwe