Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) batting coach and mentor Dinesh Karthik wants the Indian Premier League’s (IPL) Impact Player rule to remain in place for the 2027 season, arguing that removing it midway through the current cycle would put certain franchises at a disadvantage. While acknowledging concerns about the rule’s long-term relevance, Karthik believes teams have built their squads and strategies around the provision. He has argued that any decision to discontinue it should be implemented only after the current cycle concludes, allowing franchises to prepare for changes under consistent playing conditions.
Introduced in IPL 2023, the Impact Player rule allows teams to bring in a substitute player during a match, providing additional flexibility with batting and bowling combinations. The provision has contributed to higher-scoring contests by allowing teams to strengthen their batting or add bowling options depending on match situations. However, the rule has also faced criticism from players and experts who believe it affects the balance between bat and ball and reduces the importance of developing specialist all-rounders.
Speaking to Cricbuzz, Karthik acknowledged that the rule initially added excitement to the competition but believes its appeal has gradually diminished. He observed that the early seasons produced several closely contested matches, while the latest edition featured fewer such finishes in his assessment. According to Karthik, the rule helped increase scoring but has become less relevant to the overall experience for players and spectators. He believes the IPL should reassess its usefulness while ensuring that any changes are introduced at an appropriate stage.
Also Read: Sourav Ganguly Named Delhi Capitals Head Coach For The Upcoming IPL 2027 Season
Karthik also expressed concern that the rule has reduced opportunities for Indian cricket to develop more all-rounders. With teams able to bring in an additional batter or bowler during a match, franchises may have less incentive to rely on players who contribute effectively in both departments. All-rounders are particularly valuable in international cricket, where teams often need balanced combinations across batting and bowling. Karthik’s comments add to the wider debate about how the IPL’s playing conditions influence the development of Indian talent.
Despite these reservations, Karthik does not want the rule removed before IPL 2027. He argued that franchises have assembled their squads with the expectation of using an additional player, and an immediate change could benefit teams better suited to an 11-player combination. In his view, altering the conditions before the end of the existing cycle would create an uneven playing field. He believes the Board of Control for Cricket in India should introduce new regulations at the beginning of a cycle and review them when that cycle ends.
The future of the Impact Player rule remains a subject of discussion among players, coaches and IPL stakeholders. Karthik’s position reflects an attempt to balance concerns about all-rounder development with the need for consistency in tournament regulations. As the BCCI considers feedback on the rule ahead of the next season, the debate is likely to continue over whether its benefits to team strategy and scoring outweigh its potential effect on player development. For Karthik, the immediate priority is to maintain the existing provision through IPL 2027 before deciding whether it should continue beyond that point.
Also Read: India, West Indies Seek Advantage In Third T20I After Batting Battles