India all-rounder Washington Sundar has come under scrutiny following his underwhelming performance in the opening T20 International against Ireland, with former cricketers and analysts questioning both his role in the team and the way he is being utilised by head coach Gautam Gambhir and the team management. India's defeat in the series opener has intensified the debate, with some experts arguing that Sundar is not being deployed in a role that maximises his strengths, while others have called for greater clarity regarding his place in the shortest format.

Sundar endured a difficult outing in Belfast, contributing little with either bat or ball. Introduced late into the bowling attack, he bowled just one over, conceding 19 runs as Ireland capitalised on the opportunity to accelerate their innings and finish with a competitive total of 182. His expensive over shifted the momentum in the hosts' favour, leaving India with a steeper chase than anticipated. The decision to use Sundar for only a single over also raised questions about the confidence the team management has in his bowling during pressure situations.

The all-rounder's struggles continued with the bat, where he managed only nine runs from 12 deliveries. Tasked with providing impetus to the innings, Sundar attempted to play aggressively but failed to establish any rhythm. His inability to rotate the strike or find boundaries added pressure on the middle order before he was eventually dismissed by Ireland pacer Matt Hollard. The modest contribution further fuelled criticism of his overall impact in a format that increasingly demands explosive performances from batting all-rounders.

Also Read: Virat Kohli's Selection for India's 2027 ODI World Cup Squad Unconfirmed

The disappointing display has reignited discussions over how Sundar is being utilised under Gautam Gambhir's coaching setup. Some observers have argued that if the team management intends to give the all-rounder an extended run in the T20 side, he should be entrusted with a clearly defined role rather than being used sporadically. Critics believe Sundar is most effective when allowed to complete his quota of overs and contribute higher up the batting order, where he has more opportunities to influence the outcome of a match.

Despite the criticism, Sundar remains one of India's most versatile cricketers, valued for his ability to contribute in multiple departments. Over the years, he has produced notable performances across all three formats, particularly with the ball in the powerplay and as a technically sound lower-order batter. However, injuries and inconsistent selection have limited his continuity in the national side, making it difficult for him to cement a permanent role. Team management has repeatedly backed his all-round abilities, viewing him as a player capable of balancing the side in different conditions.

With the second T20I against Ireland approaching, attention will be on whether India persists with Sundar or considers changes to the playing XI. The series presents an opportunity for both the player and the coaching staff to respond to the criticism by defining his responsibilities more clearly. As India continues to build combinations ahead of future ICC tournaments, the debate surrounding Sundar's role highlights the broader challenge of balancing player development with the immediate need for consistent performances in international cricket.

Also Read: Sreesanth Alleges Gautam Gambhir Called Him 'Deshdrohi' During Heated On-Field Clash