The Delhi High Court has directed the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) to decide within two weeks on the show-cause notice issued to wrestler Vinesh Phogat, in a case involving allegations of indiscipline and eligibility restrictions linked to domestic and international competitions. The court’s direction came while disposing of Phogat’s petition challenging the federation’s disciplinary action and selection criteria for upcoming tournaments.
The matter was heard by a bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, which instructed the WFI to take a final decision on the May 9 show-cause notice within a fixed timeframe. During the proceedings, the federation’s counsel submitted that a decision would be taken within four weeks. However, the court shortened the timeline, emphasizing the need for timely resolution of the dispute given its impact on the athlete’s participation in competitive events.
The May 9 show-cause notice issued by the WFI alleged that Phogat had not complied with the mandatory six-month notice period required under rules governing athletes returning from retirement, as stipulated under the anti-doping framework of United World Wrestling. The federation also raised concerns over alleged disciplinary violations and declared her ineligible for participation in domestic competitions pending resolution of the matter.
Also Read: Delhi HC Orders Removal Of Defamatory Content Against AAP MP Raghav Chadha
In its communication, the WFI described Phogat’s disqualification at the 2024 Paris Olympics as a “national embarrassment” and “deplorable,” intensifying the dispute between the wrestler and the governing body. The federation further linked its decision to broader concerns about athlete conduct and compliance with regulatory requirements governing participation in national selection processes.
Phogat’s legal counsel argued before the court that the show-cause notice raised significant questions of law and procedural fairness. They also highlighted that a subsequent notice was issued on June 17 in relation to her conduct during Asian Games selection trials. Additionally, the counsel informed the court that Phogat had requested permission to participate in three international competitions, but the federation had not responded to her applications.
The court’s directive effectively ensures that the disciplinary proceedings are concluded within a defined timeframe, while leaving the merits of the allegations to be decided by the WFI. The case has drawn attention within the sporting community, as it touches upon broader issues of athlete rights, selection transparency, and governance within Indian wrestling administration.
Also Read: Government Rejects Claims Linking CJI, Ministers To UK Badminton Event