The Supreme Court on Wednesday raised concerns over the preventive detention of Ladakh activist Sonam Wangchuk under the National Security Act (NSA), suggesting that the Central government may have over-interpreted his speeches. The Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale heard the plea filed by Wangchuk’s wife, Gitanjali J Angmo, challenging his detention.

During proceedings, the court noted that Wangchuk had expressed concerns over the departure of some youth from Gandhian peaceful methods, rather than advocating violence. “He is worried… We will have to take the entire sentence… ‘some people are abandoning Gandhian peaceful ways. This is worrying,’” the Bench observed, emphasizing that the statements reflect concern rather than intent to incite unrest.

Opposing the plea, Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj argued that Wangchuk had warned of a potential violent agitation in Ladakh, similar to past events in Nepal and Bangladesh, and that some youth were doubting the effectiveness of peaceful protests. The court, however, repeatedly said that the government appeared to be reading “too much into” his words.

Also Read: Supreme Court Questions Centre Over Sonam Wangchuk's Continued Detention

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta cautioned the Bench against comparing Wangchuk to Mahatma Gandhi, saying it could be misrepresented by the media. The court clarified that its observations were made in a contextual reading and would not be interpreted outside the courtroom. The Bench also dismissed concerns over health claims being exaggerated on social media.

Wangchuk, detained following September 2025 protests in Leh demanding statehood and Sixth Schedule status for Ladakh, has been denied release despite health concerns. Last week, the SC had urged the government to review his detention in light of his deteriorating condition, but authorities maintained he was “hale and hearty.”

Counsel for Wangchuk’s wife argued that the activist has a democratic right to criticize the government and protest peacefully, which should not be construed as a threat to national security. The Supreme Court has yet to pass orders, with the hearing continuing as the government defends its stance on the detention.

Also Read: Centre Tells Supreme Court Sonam Wangchuk Detained for Instigating Protests in Border Area