The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the nationwide rollout of 20% ethanol-blended petrol (EBP-20), rejecting claims that the fuel damages vehicles not designed for it. The decision, delivered by a bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, upholds the government’s push for EBP-20, despite concerns raised by advocate Akshay Malhotra about its impact on millions of motorists.

Malhotra’s PIL sought directives to ensure ethanol-free petrol availability at fuel stations, mandatory labeling of ethanol content at pumps, and clear consumer information on vehicle compatibility. The plea argued that vehicles manufactured before 2023, including some newer BS-VI models, are not equipped to handle high ethanol blends, potentially causing mechanical degradation and efficiency losses. It also demanded a nationwide study to assess the impact of EBP-20 on non-compliant vehicles, claiming motorists are being forced to use unsuitable fuel.

The Centre defended the EBP-20 program, highlighting its benefits for sugarcane farmers and its role in reducing carbon emissions. The government opposed the PIL, arguing that the policy aligns with India’s renewable energy goals and economic interests. The Supreme Court sided with the Centre, stating that the issue falls within the government’s policy domain and does not warrant judicial intervention.

Also Read: Supreme Court to Hear PIL on Ethanol Petrol Rollout

The ruling has sparked debate among vehicle owners, with many expressing concerns about potential long-term damage to engines and fuel systems. Critics argue that the lack of ethanol-free options and inadequate consumer awareness could burden motorists. As India accelerates its ethanol-blending program, the decision reinforces the government’s green energy agenda, but questions about vehicle compatibility and transparency remain unresolved.

Also Read: Supreme Court Pushes Centre on Ram Setu Monument Status