A Delhi High Court judge on Wednesday recused himself from hearing a petition challenging the Centre’s action against the Delhi Gymkhana Club, including proceedings concerning the proposed eviction of the club from its 27.3-acre premises on Safdarjung Road. Justice Prateek Jalan stepped aside from the matter, saying there were circumstances in which a judge may not be able to fully trust his own judgment. He directed that the plea filed by the Delhi Gymkhana Club Staff Welfare Association be placed before another bench on Friday. The development means the legal challenge will now be considered by a different judge as members and employees continue to contest the action taken against the institution.

Justice Jalan made the decision to recuse himself while the matter came up before him on Wednesday. Explaining his decision, the judge said, “I am going to recuse from this matter. There are matters where one does not trust one's own judgement.” He further observed that there was “too much personal” involvement and said he would feel more comfortable if another judge heard the case. The remarks were made while the court was dealing with the petition challenging the action relating to the Gymkhana Club premises. A judicial recusal does not by itself amount to a finding on the merits of the dispute or indicate that either side has prevailed. Instead, it allows the matter to be placed before another bench where the proceedings can continue.

The dispute concerns the Delhi Gymkhana Club’s occupation of its large premises on Safdarjung Road and action initiated by the authorities over the club’s continued possession. The Staff Welfare Association has approached the High Court as the wider dispute involving the club, its members and employees moves through the courts. The premises, spread across about 27.3 acres, have been at the centre of proceedings concerning the termination of the club’s lease and the subsequent steps for eviction. Members and staff have challenged the action, seeking judicial scrutiny of the process and the legal basis on which the authorities are seeking to remove the club from the property.

Also Read: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Ola, Uber, Rapido Over Women’s Safety

The latest proceedings come after the Supreme Court allowed members of the Delhi Gymkhana Club to approach the Delhi High Court over the Centre’s action. That development opened the way for the club-related legal challenges to be examined by the High Court. The dispute has involved questions surrounding the management and functioning of the club, its leasehold rights and the government’s authority to take action concerning the property. With the matter now being transferred to another bench, the High Court will have to consider the petitions independently and determine the issues raised by the members, staff and other parties involved in the proceedings.

The Delhi Gymkhana Club, one of the capital’s prominent members-only institutions, has operated from its Safdarjung Road premises for decades. Its property and governance have previously been the subject of scrutiny by public authorities. The current dispute, however, centres on the government’s action concerning the lease and the consequences of its termination, including the move to secure possession of the land. For the club’s employees, the proceedings also have implications for their employment and working arrangements, which is why the Staff Welfare Association has separately approached the court. The association’s petition gives the judiciary an opportunity to examine the concerns raised by staff in the context of the broader eviction proceedings.

With Justice Jalan recusing himself, the immediate next step will be the listing of the staff association’s plea before another Delhi High Court bench on Friday. The new bench will consider the matter without being bound by the fact that the previous judge had stepped aside, and the parties will have an opportunity to present their respective arguments. The recusal is not a ruling on the legality of the Centre’s action, the validity of the lease termination or the proposed eviction. Those questions remain to be decided through the judicial process. The case is therefore set to continue before a different bench, with the outcome likely to determine the next stage of the dispute over the Gymkhana Club’s long-standing premises on Safdarjung Road.

Also Read: Disability Alone Cannot Be Ground To Deny Reproductive Autonomy Delhi HC