US Vice President JD Vance has expressed doubts about whether the Pentagon will proceed with plans to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, the former US Army psychiatrist convicted of killing 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. Speaking to reporters on Friday, October 9, Vance said he was unsure whether the proposed broadcast would take place and made clear that he would not watch it if it went ahead. The execution is scheduled for December 3 and is expected to be carried out by firing squad.
Vance described Hasan’s 2009 attack as one of the most serious acts of terrorism on American soil outside the September 11 attacks. He emphasised the gravity of the crime while expressing uncertainty about the Pentagon’s plan to make the execution publicly accessible. His remarks came amid growing criticism of the proposed broadcast, including objections from lawmakers across party lines and religious leaders who have questioned the decision to make an execution available for public viewing.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth previously indicated that the execution would be made public, arguing that it would demonstrate the consequences of such crimes. A Pentagon official also confirmed that a livestream was planned. However, Vance’s comments have raised questions about whether the proposal has broad support within the administration of President Donald Trump. Trump has backed Hasan’s execution by firing squad but has not publicly clarified his position on broadcasting the event.
Also Read: Saudi Arabia Rejects ‘Fake News’ Claim Over Alleged Suicide Bomber At Mecca Mosque
The proposed livestream has drawn criticism from several members of Congress. Republican Representative Austin Scott expressed support for Hasan facing execution but argued that broadcasting it would be inappropriate. Democratic Senator Mark Kelly also supported the principle of justice while questioning whether a public execution would reflect American values. Critics have warned that broadcasting the event could be used by extremist groups for propaganda and recruitment, potentially undermining the stated aim of deterring terrorism.
The United Nations human rights office has also condemned the plan, warning that livestreaming an execution could amount to public punishment that violates international human rights standards. Meanwhile, technology platforms including YouTube, Meta and X had not publicly clarified whether they would permit the broadcast, while TikTok referred to its rules restricting graphic depictions of violence. The debate has renewed wider discussion in the United States about capital punishment, the public nature of executions and the balance between accountability, human dignity and the potential consequences of broadcasting state-imposed punishment.
Also Read: Netanyahu Rejects Early Conclusion on Iran’s Role in Flydubai Incident