U.S. officials are reportedly exploring plans to arm Iranian Kurdish militias and other opposition factions as part of the broader conflict with Iran following recent escalations, according to multiple news outlets and sources. This potentially significant shift in U.S. strategy aims to stretch Iranian forces and create openings for internal resistance amid ongoing airstrikes by U.S. and allied forces.

According to reporting by CNN and Reuters, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has been engaged in discussions with Iranian Kurdish leaders based in northern Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdish region along the Iraq-Iran border. The talks focus on whether and how Kurdish militias might attack Iran’s security forces in western Iran to weaken Tehran’s grip and assist internal dissent.

The strategy reflects a U.S. assessment that empowering ground forces opposed to the regime could complement military pressure from the air and further complicate Iran’s ability to respond to Western strikes. Some Kurdish officials have indicated readiness to participate in ground operations “in the coming days,” though final operational decisions and formal U.S. commitments have not been publicly confirmed.

Also Read: Former US President Trump Says He Intervened To Avert India-Pakistan Nuclear Crisis

Meanwhile, airstrikes have intensified along the Iran-Iraq border, with U.S. and Israeli forces targeting Iranian military positions — a development interpreted as part of the broader strategy to pressure Tehran and support allied ground actors. Kurdish and other ethnic armed groups have reportedly been organizing into coalitions with the aim of challenging Iranian control in the region.

Experts warn that the potential arming of Kurdish militias carries significant risks of widening the conflict beyond the current air campaign, potentially destabilizing Iraq’s Kurdish region and straining relations with neighboring countries. Turkey, for example, has historically opposed the arming of Kurdish armed groups near its borders and could react strongly to such developments.

U.S. officials, including Pentagon leadership, have publicly downplayed the idea that Washington’s objectives depend on any specific group’s involvement, emphasizing broader strategic goals. However, the months-long escalation and evolving military calculus suggest that Kurdish forces could play a more prominent role — whether as proxies or independent actors — even as diplomatic, military, and regional responses continue to unfold.

Also Read: Israel Says Iran’s Next Supreme Leader Will Be ‘Target for Elimination’