The Supreme Court of India on Thursday issued notice to the Government of Maharashtra on a bail plea filed by the father of the key accused in the Pune Porsche crash case, seeking the state’s response. The matter arises from the fatal luxury car accident in Pune, Maharashtra, that led to widespread public outrage and intensified scrutiny of legal proceedings involving influential families.

The crash occurred when a high-end Porsche allegedly driven by a minor rammed into a motorcycle, resulting in the deaths of two young professionals. Investigators subsequently arrested the minor’s father, a real estate developer, on allegations that he attempted to interfere with evidence and influence the handling of the case. He has been in judicial custody following proceedings in lower courts, where earlier bail applications were contested.

During the Supreme Court hearing, counsel for the petitioner argued that continued incarceration was unjustified, contending that the investigation had progressed substantially and that the accused was cooperating with authorities. The bench, while refraining from expressing any view on the merits, directed the Maharashtra government to file its response and scheduled the matter for further hearing. The state is expected to oppose the plea, citing the seriousness of the allegations and the potential impact on the integrity of the trial.

Also Read: Supreme Court Directs Removal Of NCERT Chapter, Centre Apologises

The Pune crash case has triggered a broader debate on juvenile accountability, parental responsibility and the administration of justice in high-profile incidents. Questions were raised earlier about the initial relief granted to the minor accused and the procedures followed by local authorities. The case also prompted discussions on road safety enforcement and regulatory oversight concerning underage driving.

Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s consideration of the bail plea will hinge on established principles governing pre-trial detention, including the gravity of the offence, likelihood of tampering with evidence and risk of influencing witnesses. The court’s eventual ruling could set an important precedent in assessing alleged complicity of guardians in criminal investigations involving minors, even as the underlying trial in the Pune crash continues.

Also Read: SC Reserves Judgment on Duraisamy’s Petition Over MK Stalin’s 2011 Victory