The Supreme Court of India has sharply criticised popular YouTuber Elvish Yadav in his ongoing legal battle over allegations related to the misuse of snakes and snake venom, warning that allowing influential figures to treat “voiceless victims” with impunity could send a “very bad message” to society.

The remarks came on Wednesday when a bench comprising Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh heard Yadav’s plea challenging criminal proceedings and a chargesheet filed against him under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, among other laws. The court underscored its concern that if public figures were perceived to be allowed to exploit protected animals or their venom, such conduct would undermine wildlife conservation norms and societal values.

Yadav, a well-known social media influencer and former contestant on reality television, was first booked in November 2023 and later arrested on March 17, 2024 in Noida after allegations surfaced that snake venom had been used at rave parties he was linked with. Authorities had reportedly rescued nine snakes, including cobras, from the scene; prosecutors claim venom was supplied as an intoxicant at these events.

Also Read: PM Modi Kicks Off India AI Impact Summit With Global Leaders In Delhi

In his defence before the Supreme Court, Yadav’s senior counsel argued that he was only a guest in a video shoot and denied involvement in any rave party or illegal activity. The defence team also questioned the basis for invoking provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, asserting that medical reports showed the examined snakes were not poisonous.

The court engaged extensively with lawyers for both sides, querying how snake venom could have been extracted and used, and emphasising that wildlife protection statutes are clear in prohibiting unauthorised handling of protected species. Justices Sundresh and Kotiswar Singh indicated they would scrutinise what legal action is appropriate under the Wildlife (Protection) Act but did not immediately dispose of the matter, instead adjourning the case for further hearing on March 19, 2026.

The case has attracted significant public interest due to Yadav’s celebrity status and broader debates over the responsibilities of influencers under Indian law. Prosecutors maintain that the chargesheet and FIR contain allegations that must be tested through trial, while the defence continues to challenge procedural and evidentiary aspects of the prosecution’s case.

Also Read: CA Husband Murders Pregnant Wife, Stages Robbery — Cops Uncover Truth Fast