India’s 408-run capitulation in the second Test against South Africa on Wednesday not only handed the Proteas their first series win on Indian soil in 25 years but also triggered an explosive debate over the team’s very composition. Former wicketkeeper-batter Parthiv Patel, speaking on Star Sports immediately after the defeat, delivered a scathing indictment of head coach Gautam Gambhir and chief selector Ajit Agarkar, declaring that the humiliating 2-0 whitewash was the inevitable result of a selection policy obsessed with all-rounders at the cost of genuine specialists.

“Test cricket is a game of specialists,” Patel repeated like a mantra. He argued that India’s ideal XI should comprise six dedicated batters, a top-class wicketkeeper-batter averaging above 40, four specialist bowlers, and only one genuine all-rounder. The Guwahati XI, packed with Ravindra Jadeja, Washington Sundar, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Kuldeep Yadav, left the side structurally unbalanced: neither deep enough in batting to post big totals nor potent enough in bowling to dismiss sides twice on turning tracks.

Patel traced the problem directly to white-ball thinking bleeding into red-ball selection. “We have started valuing players because of the IPL impact-player rule,” he said, pointing out that the perceived flexibility of multi-skilled cricketers has quietly replaced the traditional demand for depth. The result, he argued, was a batting line-up that repeatedly crumbled and a bowling attack that, outside Jasprit Bumrah’s spells, never looked threatening enough to bowl out South Africa even once in four innings across the series.

Also Read: India’s 2-0 Defeat Sparks “Gautam Gambhir Hay Hay” Chants From Guwahati Crowd

The numbers were brutal: South Africa racked up 489 in their first innings and declared at 260/5 in the second, setting an unassailable 549. India were bundled out for 201 and 140, with only Ravindra Jadeja crossing fifty once. Patel insisted the collapse was not a failure of effort but of architecture: too many bits-and-pieces players meant no one was truly secure or dominant in their primary role.

His critique found instant resonance. Former India spinner Anil Kumble and pacer Venkatesh Prasad echoed the sentiment, with Kumble calling the obsession with all-rounders “an absolute brain-fade” and Prasad questioning why India was “playing musical chairs with the XI” at home. Fans at Barsapara Stadium vented their anger with chants of “Gautam Gambhir hay hay,” while social media erupted with memes and demands for accountability from both the coach and the selection committee.

Six months into Gambhir’s tenure, India has now lost five consecutive home tests, a record unthinkable during the previous decade. With the World Test Championship final hopes effectively extinguished and a tough tour of England looming, the Guwahati debacle has become a defining moment, forcing Indian cricket to confront whether its pursuit of versatility has come at the unacceptable cost of Test-match identity and success.

Also Read: “Who Calls Him An All-Rounder?” Srikkanth Shockingly Dismisses Nitish Reddy’s Skills