The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected bail for Alemla Jamir, a self-styled cabinet minister of the banned Naga insurgent group NSCN-IM, in a high-profile National Investigation Agency (NIA) case involving terror funding and extortion. A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma cited the gravity of the allegations, stating they "shock our conscience," and deemed it inappropriate to grant relief at this stage with the trial underway. The decision upholds prior rejections by lower courts and underscores judicial caution against granting liberty to figures accused of sustaining armed insurgencies through illicit networks.

Jamir's arrest stems from a dramatic interception at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport on December 17, 2019, where NIA sleuths recovered Rs 72 lakh in undeclared cash from her possession as she prepared to board a flight to Dimapur, Nagaland's commercial hub. Unable to furnish a credible source for the funds, Jamir triggered an income tax probe and subsequent NIA charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and sections of the Indian Penal Code for criminal conspiracy and extortion. The agency alleges she orchestrated a "sophisticated network", leveraging NSCN-IM's armed wing, the Naga Army, to systematically extract levies from Dimapur's business community, funnelling proceeds into at least 20 bank accounts—some under fictitious names—to finance the outfit's operations.

The NSCN-IM, designated a terrorist organisation under UAPA since 2013, has long dominated Naga separatist militancy in India's Northeast, demanding sovereignty over Naga-inhabited areas spanning four states and Myanmar. Despite a 2015 Framework Agreement with the Centre, the group—led by Thuingaleng Muivah—has persisted in low-intensity violence and overground activities, including parallel taxation that cripples local economies. Jamir, a prominent woman leader in the outfit's "Kilo Affairs" department (handling finance and logistics), embodies this duality: outwardly a social worker, allegedly a key financier of arms procurement and cadre welfare. Her husband, Phungthing Shimrang, NSCN-IM's defence secretary, remains absconding, bolstering flight risk concerns.

Also Read: Congress: Why Won’t Election Commission Reveal Number of Non-Citizens Removed in Bihar?

Jamir's bail odyssey began with a trial court denial in 2020, followed by a second rejection in 2023. The Delhi High Court, on January 13, 2025, dismissed her appeal, emphasising her influential position could enable witness tampering and evidence manipulation. "Justice hurried is justice buried," the HC noted, cautioning against rushed trials that compromise evidentiary quality, yet affirming the prosecution's push for expedition. Jamir contested the charges, arguing insufficient proof of her direct involvement, but the court highlighted forensic trails linking her to extortion rackets targeting traders in jewellery, timber, and real estate sectors.

Directing the trial court to expedite proceedings via video conferencing and urging Jamir's cooperation, the Supreme Court adjourned the matter to the second week of January 2026. This ruling aligns with a broader judicial trend tightening bail norms in UAPA cases, as seen in recent denials for Khalistani separatists and Maoist operatives. For Nagaland, where NSCN-IM's writ rivals the state's in rural pockets, the verdict may embolden peace talks while signalling zero tolerance for terror financing. As the trial unfolds—poised for a potential 2026 conclusion—the case spotlights the Northeast's fragile truces, where economic coercion sustains shadows of conflict amid stalled negotiations.

Also Read: NCP’s Bhujbal Highlights Budget Strain From Rs 40,000–45,000 Crore ‘Ladki Bahin’ Scheme