The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on March 11 or 12, 2026, dismissed a writ petition challenging the conduct and results of the Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board (TNUSRB) Sub-Inspector (SI) recruitment examination, effectively upholding the selection process. Justice G. Arul Murugan, who heard the matter, rejected the plea filed by a candidate who alleged irregularities in the physical efficiency test (PET), evaluation of marks, and overall transparency in the recruitment cycle that concluded in late 2025.

The petitioner contended that certain candidates were unfairly awarded marks in the PET despite not meeting prescribed standards, and raised concerns over discrepancies in the provisional and final selection lists published by TNUSRB. The plea sought quashing of the results, a fresh evaluation under court supervision, and directions for a re-test in disputed segments. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the lapses violated principles of fairness and equality enshrined in the recruitment notification.

Opposing the petition, the TNUSRB, represented by its standing counsel, submitted that the entire process—including the written examination, PET, viva-voce, and document verification—was conducted strictly in accordance with established rules and guidelines. The Board produced records showing that physical tests were supervised by independent observers, medical officers, and video documentation, while any complaints during the process had been duly addressed. It maintained that no widespread irregularities were found and that the selection adhered to the notified criteria.

Also Read: AIADMK Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against DVAC in Cash-for-Jobs Controversy

After perusing the materials and hearing both sides, the court observed that the allegations remained largely unsubstantiated and appeared to stem from individual dissatisfaction rather than systemic flaws. The judge noted that the petitioner had participated in all stages without raising contemporaneous objections and had approached the court only after the final merit list was released. Finding no merit in the claims of arbitrariness or mala fide action, the bench dismissed the petition with costs.

The ruling clears the way for TNUSRB to proceed with appointment orders for the successful candidates in the SI (Grade II) recruitment, which aimed to fill several hundred vacancies in the Tamil Nadu Police. Authorities have indicated that training and postings for the selected batch could commence soon, bringing closure to a recruitment drive that had drawn significant applications and scrutiny. The decision reinforces the judiciary's reluctance to interfere in recruitment processes absent clear evidence of illegality, while reminding aggrieved parties to exhaust internal grievance mechanisms before approaching courts.

Also Read: Madras HC Defers Plea Against Eight Tamil Nadu G-RAM-G Provisions to February 24