Pakistan’s decision to not take the field against India in the T20 World Cup has pushed the tournament into uncharted territory, with officials and legal experts closely examining the consequences under ICC regulations. At the centre of Pakistan’s strategy is the invocation of a “force majeure” clause, a move that, if rejected, could have serious sporting and administrative repercussions.

Under ICC playing conditions, the procedure is clear if one team refuses to play. India would travel to Colombo as scheduled, train, and attend the mandatory pre-match commitments. If Pakistan then declines to take the field, the match will be officially forfeited. India would be awarded two points, Pakistan would receive none, and Pakistan’s net run rate would be adversely affected—a potentially decisive blow in a tightly contested group stage.

There is only one scenario in which Pakistan could avoid a forfeit. If India were to not travel for the fixture, the match would be deemed cancelled rather than forfeited, resulting in a point being shared between the two sides. However, ICC rules place responsibility squarely on the team refusing to play, making Pakistan’s position particularly vulnerable unless extraordinary circumstances are established.

Also Read: BCCI VP Rajiv Shukla Agrees with ICC: Selective Boycott Undermines Global Cricket Integrity

That is where the concept of force majeure comes into play. Traditionally, force majeure applies to unforeseeable and unavoidable events such as natural disasters, war, or extreme security threats that make participation impossible. According to ICC sources, political objections or diplomatic disputes alone do not meet this threshold unless accompanied by clear, demonstrable risks to player safety or feasibility.

History suggests the ICC prioritises tournament integrity over accommodation. Past World Cups have seen teams forfeit matches over security or political concerns, with full points awarded to opponents. In several cases, boards later faced scrutiny or sanctions, reinforcing the narrow interpretation of force majeure provisions.

Beyond the immediate points table, Pakistan also risks longer-term consequences. ICC officials have indicated that a refusal deemed to be a breach of participation obligations could invite disciplinary action against the Pakistan Cricket Board. What was expected to be the tournament’s marquee clash now risks becoming its most consequential non-match—decided not by performance on the field but by regulations that leave little room for manoeuvre.

Also Read: Mitchell Marsh Dismisses Query On Pakistan's Potential Boycott Of India Match In T20 World Cup 2026