The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notices to 20 rebel Trinamool Congress MPs who allegedly defected from the party and merged with the little-known Nationalist Congress Party of India (NCPI) to join the National Democratic Alliance (NDA). The notices came in response to a petition filed by TMC general secretary and Lok Sabha leader Abhishek Banerjee, who has sought an early decision on the party's disqualification petitions. A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi heard Banerjee's plea and directed notices to be issued to the 20 MPs.
The petition concerns the TMC's requests for their disqualification from Parliament following their alleged defection and subsequent political alignment with the NDA. Banerjee has approached the top court seeking an expeditious decision from Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on the disqualification petitions. Under the constitutional framework governing defections, the Speaker is empowered to decide whether a member has incurred disqualification under the anti-defection law. The TMC has therefore sought judicial intervention to ensure that its petitions are decided without undue delay.
The case centres on the political status of the 20 MPs and the circumstances surrounding their move away from the TMC. The party has challenged their alleged defection and merger with NCPI, arguing that the MPs should face disqualification proceedings. The Supreme Court's notices now give the rebel MPs an opportunity to respond to the allegations raised in Banerjee's petition. The court had earlier indicated that it could issue notice to the Lok Sabha Speaker as well. However, no notice was issued to Birla during Tuesday's proceedings after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Speaker, requested that the court refrain from doing so. The court accepted the request while proceeding with notices to the rebel MPs.
Also Read: Rajasthan’s Jojari River Buffer Gets SC Protection With 100-Metre Construction Restriction
The decision not to issue notice to the Speaker is significant because Banerjee's petition specifically seeks an expeditious decision from the Lok Sabha on the disqualification requests. The Speaker's office is at the centre of the dispute because the pending petitions concern the parliamentary status of the 20 MPs. The anti-defection issue has major political implications because the 20 MPs are alleged to have shifted their allegiance from the TMC to another political formation that subsequently joined the NDA. Whether such a move amounts to disqualification depends on the application of the constitutional provisions and the facts surrounding the alleged merger. The Supreme Court's proceedings could therefore have consequences beyond the individual MPs involved.
The notices issued on Tuesday do not amount to a final finding by the Supreme Court on whether the MPs should be disqualified. The rebel lawmakers will have an opportunity to present their response before the court considers the legal questions raised by Banerjee. The Speaker's role in deciding the original disqualification petitions also remains a central issue. The case will now move forward with responses from the 20 MPs expected before the Supreme Court. Banerjee's plea seeks to accelerate the process surrounding the TMC's disqualification petitions, while the court's decision to issue notices only to the rebel lawmakers, and not the Speaker at this stage, has shaped the immediate course of the proceedings.
Also Read: Supreme Court Seeks Centre, Jharkhand Response On JPSC CBI Probe Plea