Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Punjab President Aman Arora on Wednesday pushed back against the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) repeated communications to Punjab Police seeking registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in the alleged "cash-for-transfer" and land fraud case. Arora said the central agency has not provided sufficient evidence to justify such action against him and other AAP leaders, framing the ED's approach as an attempt to generate political pressure rather than pursue a properly substantiated legal process. "If there is evidence, present it. Let the investigation happen properly. But this politics of selective notices and newspaper headlines will not work," Arora told reporters, rejecting what he described as an effort to build a case through public pressure and media narratives rather than documented proof.

His remarks signal that the AAP leadership intends to contest the ED's actions publicly while insisting that any investigation adhere to due process. Arora alleged that the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) broader objective is to create political instability and unsettle Punjab's administrative machinery. He said the strategy appeared aimed at intimidating the state's political leadership while placing government officers under undue pressure, thereby making it difficult for the AAP-led Punjab government to function effectively. By framing the ED's letters as part of a larger political strategy, Arora sought to shift the narrative away from the specific allegations and toward what he characterized as a pattern of central overreach into state affairs.

Referring to the ED's latest letter to Punjab Director General of Police (DGP) seeking an FIR under Section 66(2), Arora characterized the move as reflecting the "desperation and frustration" of the BJP-led central government rather than a substantiated legal case. He noted that this was not an isolated communication but part of a pattern of repeated requests from the agency to state police, suggesting that the frequency of the letters itself was indicative of the ED's inability to build a solid case through standard investigative channels.

Also Read: ED Raids 14 Premises Across Multiple States in NHAI Toll Plaza Fraud Case

Arora further stated that Punjab Police had already responded to the ED on August 28, formally requesting complete documentary and electronic evidence to support the allegations before proceeding further. According to Arora, the police communication made clear that the material shared by the ED so far was insufficient and unclear, and that comprehensive evidence — including documents and electronic data reportedly seized during searches — needed to be furnished for a credible investigation to move forward. This position, as described by Arora, effectively places the onus back on the central agency to substantiate its claims before state authorities take further action such as registering an FIR.

The dispute centers on the procedural threshold for initiating a formal criminal investigation, with the Punjab government appearing to insist that an FIR should not be registered on the basis of allegations alone, absent supporting documentation. The ED, for its part, has continued to press the state police for compliance, though the specific evidence it has shared has been described by Punjab Police as inadequate. The back-and-forth illustrates a broader tension between state and central law enforcement bodies over jurisdiction, evidentiary standards, and the pace at which politically sensitive cases should proceed.

The exchange marks the latest flashpoint in an ongoing standoff between the AAP-led Punjab government and central investigative agencies, with both sides trading accusations over the handling of the case. Arora's remarks suggest the state government intends to insist on procedural rigor before any FIR is registered, setting the stage for continued friction between state and central authorities in the weeks ahead. Whether the ED will respond by providing the additional documentation sought by Punjab Police, or escalate its efforts through other channels, remains to be seen as the case continues to unfold.

Also Read: ED vs Punjab Police: Agency Tells Court Seven Letters Sent, Yet No FIR In 'Transfer Racket'