The Unnao rape survivor has powerfully reaffirmed her resolve for justice, declaring that political power cannot diminish the severity of the crime committed against her. Speaking ahead of a crucial Supreme Court hearing, she emphasized that "a rapist is a rapist," regardless of the accused's influence or status. She expressed determination to appear personally before the court to present her ordeal and seek accountability for what she described as unjustifiable delays by the Central Bureau of Investigation in handling the case involving former BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar.

The survivor sharply criticized the CBI for alleged inaction during critical phases of the trial, stating that the agency's recent challenge to the suspension of Sengar's sentence came far too late. She recounted attending court hearings alone, often without visible support from CBI lawyers, while managing family responsibilities. Highlighting the emotional and logistical toll, she noted instances of leaving household tasks unfinished to appear in court, only to find limited institutional presence backing her fight.

Questioning the timing of the CBI's petition in the Supreme Court—which contests the Delhi High Court's decision to suspend Sengar's life sentence during his appeal—the survivor argued that earlier intervention could have strengthened her case significantly. She pointed out that despite assurances, progress remained sluggish, raising broader concerns about timely justice in cases involving powerful individuals. Sengar, convicted in 2019 and sentenced to life imprisonment, remains incarcerated due to a separate sentence in the related death of the survivor's father.

Also Read: Supreme Court Intervenes to Pause Kokate’s Conviction in Cheating and Forgery Case

Reiterating her unwavering stance, the survivor rejected any leniency based on the accused's former political position, describing him as a "monster" whose actions should face undiluted consequences. She stressed that bail or sentence suspension does not equate to acquittal and voiced concern over potential influence if released. Invoking the principle that "justice delayed is justice denied," she affirmed her faith in the judiciary to address the protracted delays.

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear the matter, including petitions from the CBI and independent lawyers challenging the bail order, the survivor's public statements have renewed focus on institutional accountability in high-profile sexual assault cases. Her decision to address the court directly underscores her enduring commitment to securing punishment for the perpetrators after years of legal battles.

Also Read: Opposition Criticises SC Aravalli Order, Calls Hills ‘Lifeline, Shield for NCR’