Joshua Aaron, creator of the popular ICEBlock iPhone app, filed a federal lawsuit Monday against the Trump administration, accusing top officials of violating his First Amendment rights by strong-arming Apple into removing the app from its store. The Texas-based developer alleges Attorney General Pam Bondi weaponised government authority to suppress protected speech that allowed users to report and track Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in real time.

ICEBlock, which had amassed over one million users before its October removal, functioned as a crowdsourced alert system for immigrant communities, warning of nearby ICE operations much like Waze flags police speed traps. Aaron argues the app constitutes core political speech and that Bondi’s threats of criminal prosecution – echoed by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons, and Border Czar Tom Homan – represent an unconstitutional attempt to silence dissent against aggressive deportation policies.

The lawsuit seeks a court declaration that ICEBlock is protected expression and demands permanent protection from prosecution for Aaron and his family. It cites Bondi’s public warnings that Aaron “better watch out” and that authorities were “looking at him,” statements the developer claims were designed to intimidate and chill development of similar tools that increase transparency around federal immigration enforcement.

Also Read: Binance Accused of Facilitating $1 Billion in Terror Transactions Ahead of Oct 7 Massacre

Apple complied swiftly after Bondi’s office contacted the company, informing Aaron that new information from law enforcement showed the app violated store guidelines by potentially endangering officers. Google similarly removed comparable Android apps. Civil liberties advocates have drawn parallels to authoritarian tactics, noting past instances where foreign governments pressured Apple to suppress protest-coordination tools in Hong Kong.

As Trump’s mass-deportation campaign intensifies, Aaron warns that eliminating public monitoring risks creating an unaccountable “paramilitary force operating with impunity.” The lawsuit marks the first major legal challenge to the administration’s efforts to control digital platforms that document federal immigration operations, setting the stage for a landmark First Amendment battle over government power to suppress location-based political speech.

Also Read: Trump Demands $1 Billion from BBC Over “Malicious” Panorama Edit