Iran has moved to impose substantial transit fees of up to $2 million on certain commercial ships crossing the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a step that has raised concerns over the security and cost of global energy flows and India’s own maritime trade. The move was outlined by Alaeddin Boroujerdi, a member of Iran’s parliament national security committee, who told state media that Iran has begun collecting these fees from select vessels, framing it as a reflection of Tehran’s enhanced control over the waterway. The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly one‑fifth of the world’s oil and a significant share of liquefied natural gas, making any new toll or restriction a potential flashpoint for global markets and piracy‑style rent‑seeking fears.
Iran has not yet announced a formal, universal tariff regime; reports suggest the $2‑million demand is being applied selectively to particular tankers or flagged vessels, rather than across the board. Analysts see the policy as part of a broader Iranian strategy to leverage its de facto choke‑hold on the Strait amid ongoing hostilities with the United States and Israel, and to recoup some of the costs of war and regional instability. At the same time, major powers including the U.S. have warned Iran that imposing tolls on international shipping would violate long‑standing norms of free navigation under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), even though neither Iran nor the U.S. has formally ratified the treaty.
For India, the stakes are high: the Strait of Hormuz is the primary conduit for Gulf‑sourced crude and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) bound for Indian ports, and any disruption or extra‑cost imposition can inflate fuel prices and widen the trade deficit. In recent weeks, Indian authorities have reported that dozens of India‑flagged vessels—mostly oil and LPG tankers—remain stranded in the Persian Gulf while a smaller number have managed to transit the Strait after coordination between New Delhi and Tehran. The Indian government has publicly reiterated its stance that navigation through the Strait must remain free, safe, and predictable, and that no state should unilaterally convert an international waterway into a revenue‑generating “toll booth.”
Also Read: Uttar Pradesh Final Electoral Roll Hits 13.39 Crore After Major Revision Exercise
New Delhi has been engaging Iranian officials behind the scenes to expedite the movement of India‑bound ships, including those carrying essential LPG and crude cargoes, while also urging Tehran to avoid any formalized toll‑like system. Diplomats say there is no “blanket arrangement” giving all Indian vessels automatic passage; instead, permissions are granted case‑by‑case, often following clarification of flag, cargo, and ultimate destination. This case‑by‑case approach has allowed some Indian‑flagged LPG tankers, such as Green Sanvi and Green Asha, to cross safely, but at least 16 India‑registered vessels with hundreds of seafarers remain waiting in the Gulf zone.
The episode has also reignited debate over the legal status of the Strait of Hormuz and whether Iran can legitimately levy fees on merchant shipping. While coastal states have certain rights in their territorial waters, international law generally treats the Strait as a “chokepoint” through which foreign vessels enjoy rights of transit passage, meaning any attempt to impose tolls could be seen as a move toward coercive control rather than a legitimate port‑usage fee. As talks between the U.S., Iran, and other regional actors continue, energy‑importing countries such as India are watching closely, wary that if the $2‑million toll becomes a semi‑regular practice, operating costs for Gulf‑bound trade could rise across the board.
Also Read: Israel Halts Strikes On Lebanon Amid US-Led Efforts To Sustain Ceasefire Talks