Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Monday stirred controversy by declaring that opposing the singing of “Vande Mataram” amounts to treason, prompting sharp debate over nationalism, freedom of expression, and the role of patriotic songs in public institutions. Speaking at a government‑organised event in Lucknow, Adityanath said the national song embodies the soul of India and should be respected across all schools, colleges, and public gatherings. (newindianexpress.com)

The chief minister’s remarks came amid a backdrop of recent controversies in educational institutions and government offices where some individuals allegedly refrained from singing the song, citing personal or religious reasons. Adityanath asserted that refusing to participate in patriotic displays undermines national unity and could be interpreted as a deliberate affront to the country. (timesofindia.indiatimes.com)

During his address, Adityanath urged authorities to ensure “strict compliance” in all government-run schools and offices, emphasizing that the song is inseparable from India’s freedom struggle and the spirit of independence. He also encouraged citizens to instil patriotic values in children and youth through education and participation in cultural activities that promote national pride. (indianexpress.com)

Also Read: Yogi Adityanath: Uttar Pradesh Now Runs on Rule of Law Instead of Riots

The statement has provoked reactions from opposition leaders and civil society groups, some of whom have called it hyperbolic and potentially restrictive of individual liberties, particularly in a multi-religious and pluralistic society. Critics argue that the use of the term “treason” conflates symbolic acts with actual threats to the state, raising questions about constitutional protections for freedom of conscience and expression. (ndtv.com)

Legal experts note that while Vande Mataram enjoys recognition as a national song, India’s constitution does not criminalize refusal to sing it. They caution that branding dissenting individuals as traitors could create social tension and intimidate citizens, particularly students and minorities. (livemint.com)

Observers say the remark highlights the broader trend of linking patriotic symbolism with political loyalty, a theme that has intensified in recent years in several Indian states. While many residents and supporters praised Adityanath for promoting patriotism, the debate underscores the delicate balance between national pride, religious freedom, and individual rights in India’s democratic framework.

Also Read: Yogi Adityanath Calls Delhi a Gas Chamber While Praising UP's Clean Air