The Madras High Court on Tuesday reserved its orders in the censor certification case involving actor Vijay’s upcoming film Jana Nayagan, following a hearing between the film’s producers, KVN Productions, and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The matter relates to delays and objections in the certification process, which the producers argue have impacted the film’s planned release.

During the post-lunch session, Additional Solicitor General ARL Sundaresan, appearing for the CBFC, told the court that the producers had not legally challenged the CBFC’s decision to refer the film to a revising committee. He also contended that the censor board was not given sufficient time to file a response in the earlier High Court proceedings, asserting that due process under the Cinematograph Act had not been fully allowed to run its course.

The CBFC further argued that the film would have been cleared had the producers not approached the court prematurely. Before the lunch break, the ASG questioned the decision to announce a January 9 release date without obtaining certification and raised doubts over the producers’ claim of a ₹500 crore investment in the project, calling it exaggerated and unsupported by records submitted to the board.

Also Read: Producers of Vijay’s Jana Nayagan Move Supreme Court Over CBFC UA Certification Stay

Representing the producers, counsel informed the court that the prolonged delay in certification had severe commercial consequences. It was also revealed during the hearing that streaming giant Amazon, which reportedly has distribution interests linked to the film, had threatened legal action if the release commitments were not met due to certification hurdles.

Jana Nayagan has attracted heightened scrutiny as it is being promoted as Vijay’s final film before he formally enters electoral politics through his party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam. Given the political sensitivity and commercial stakes involved, the case has drawn significant public and industry attention.

The High Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, reserved its verdict. The ruling is expected to clarify the scope of the CBFC’s authority, the obligations of film producers under certification law, and the balance between regulatory oversight and commercial timelines in high-profile film releases.

Also Read: Court Ends Censor Row, Paves Way for Jana Nayagan Theatrical Release