CJP Raises Concerns Over Paper Leak Law, Calls For Stronger Preventive Measures

The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has criticised the newly passed Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, arguing that the legislation focuses more on punishing offenders after paper leaks occur rather than addressing the systemic issues that allow such incidents to happen. CJP national spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka on Wednesday questioned the approach of the amended anti-paper leak law, saying that stricter punishments alone would not be enough to prevent examination-related irregularities.

His remarks came after the Lok Sabha cleared the bill, which seeks to strengthen existing provisions against unfair practices in public examinations. In a video message posted on X, Ranka said the government should focus on improving the examination system, strengthening security mechanisms and identifying weaknesses that lead to question paper leaks. He argued that prevention should be the primary objective rather than relying only on punitive action after an incident takes place.

The criticism comes amid heightened political debate over examination irregularities, particularly following the NEET-UG controversy that led to demands for accountability and changes in the education system. The issue intensified after questions were raised over alleged paper leaks and the handling of the examination process. The amended legislation increases the maximum punishment for offences related to paper leaks and unfair practices in public examinations. Under the new provisions, those found guilty could face up to 10 years of imprisonment along with a fine of up to ₹50 lakh.

Also Read: CJI Says SC Could Consider Plea On Metro Station Closures After Inaction

The bill aims to create stronger deterrence against individuals and organised groups involved in leaking question papers, facilitating cheating or engaging in other unfair practices during competitive and public examinations. The government has maintained that strict action is necessary to protect the credibility of examination systems. However, Ranka argued that focusing primarily on punishment does not address the root causes behind paper leaks. He suggested that authorities should examine issues such as examination security, administrative failures, technology gaps and accountability mechanisms to prevent such incidents.

The passage of the bill follows growing concerns among students and opposition groups over the integrity of major examinations conducted across the country. Several student organisations have demanded greater transparency, stronger safeguards and quicker action against those responsible for irregularities. The government has defended the amendment, stating that stronger legal provisions will discourage organised malpractice and ensure that those involved in compromising examinations face serious consequences. Officials have said that maintaining the fairness of public examinations is essential for protecting the interests of millions of students.

The debate over the legislation highlights the wider challenge of balancing punishment with preventive reforms. While stricter penalties may act as a deterrent, education experts and critics have argued that long-term solutions require stronger systems, improved monitoring and greater accountability at every stage of the examination process. As the bill moves through the legislative process, discussions are expected to continue over whether the proposed measures are sufficient to tackle the recurring issue of paper leaks and restore confidence among students appearing for competitive examinations.

Also Read: 23 Parties, Independent MP Move CJI Over SIR, Raise EC Accountability Concerns