South Korea’s Ex-President Sentenced To 30 Years Over Drone Incident

Former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol has been sentenced to 30 years in prison for ordering drone incursions into North Korea, a case that prosecutors said was linked to attempts to create a pretext for his controversial martial law declaration in 2024, according to a Seoul court ruling on Friday. The Seoul Central District Court confirmed the sentence, stating that Yoon was found guilty of charges related to the drone operation, which allegedly escalated military tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

Special prosecutors had argued that the operation was designed to “fabricate wartime conditions” and undermine state security, claims that became central to the case. The verdict comes months after Yoon was separately sentenced to life imprisonment in February for leading what prosecutors described as an insurrection aimed at paralysing South Korea’s National Assembly through the declaration of martial law. The latest ruling adds to his cumulative legal troubles, marking one of the most severe punishments handed to a former South Korean head of state.

According to prosecutors, the drone operations carried out toward North Korea not only heightened tensions with Pyongyang but also risked exposing classified military information after some of the drones reportedly crashed. The Yonhap news agency reported that sensitive details about South Korea’s military capabilities may have been compromised during the incidents. Yoon’s legal team rejected all allegations, arguing that there was no direct order or subsequent approval from the former president for the drone missions.

Also Read: South Korea Parliament May Probe Ballot Shortages Reported During Local Elections

They maintained that the operations were conducted in response to North Korea sending balloons carrying trash into South Korean territory, and described them as defensive actions unrelated to the martial law controversy. His lawyers further characterised the prosecution’s case as speculative and politically motivated, while insisting that the actions were legitimate responses to cross-border provocations.

Yoon has also appealed against his earlier insurrection conviction, maintaining that his declaration of martial law was intended to protect national security. Drone activity has long been a sensitive issue between the two Koreas, which technically remain in a state of war. The case has further intensified political divisions in South Korea, even as both sides continue to exchange accusations over military provocations and psychological operations across the heavily fortified border.

Also Read: Lee Jae Myung Reaffirms South Korea Commitment To North Korea Denuclearisation Talks