Elon Musk Says Grok AI Diagnoses MRIs Better Than Doctors After Saving Man's Life
Elon Musk claims Grok AI outperforms doctors in diagnosing MRIs, highlights life-saving appendicitis case.
An old video of Elon Musk praising the medical diagnostic capabilities of Grok AI has resurfaced online, sparking renewed discussion around artificial intelligence in healthcare. Originally shared in June 2025, the video features Musk claiming that AI can analyze X-rays and MRI scans and, in some cases, deliver more accurate diagnoses than human doctors.
In the video, Musk states that Grok, developed by his AI company xAI, can already assist with medical diagnostics by interpreting uploaded imaging scans. He suggests that AI’s ability to process data rapidly and identify patterns could make it a powerful support tool in healthcare, particularly in situations where speed and accuracy are critical.
The clip regained attention after Musk reposted a claim shared by Tesla Owners Silicon Valley, describing a case in which Grok allegedly helped save a man’s life. According to the post, a 49-year-old Norwegian man suffering from severe abdominal pain was initially misdiagnosed with acid reflux at an emergency room and sent home with antacids.
Also Read: Priyanka Chaturvedi Demands Action on Grok AI Misuse Targeting Women's Photos
Still in pain, the man reportedly consulted Grok, which flagged a possible perforated ulcer or appendicitis and urged immediate medical imaging. When the patient returned to the hospital, a CT scan confirmed a severely inflamed appendix on the verge of rupture. Emergency surgery was performed, and the man later made a full recovery, crediting Grok for prompting timely intervention.
Musk’s endorsement of Grok’s diagnostic potential has triggered widespread debate on social media. Supporters argue that AI tools can reduce delays in diagnosis, especially in hospitals where patients may wait days for radiology reports. Critics, however, warn against overreliance on AI, citing instances of incorrect or inconsistent assessments.
Reactions online ranged from praise to skepticism, with some users sharing positive experiences and others questioning the reliability of AI-driven diagnoses. While the incident has amplified interest in AI’s role in medical imaging, experts continue to stress that such tools should complement—not replace—trained medical professionals, highlighting the need for careful regulation and clinical validation.
Also Read: Himachal Doctors' Indefinite Strike Halts Hospitals Over Colleague's Termination
