High Court Seeks Policy From Uttarakhand on Release of Completed-Sentence Prisoners
Uttarakhand High Court seeks state response on prisoners detained after completing sentences.
The Uttarakhand High Court has sought a detailed explanation from the state government over delays in releasing prisoners who have allegedly completed their life sentences, raising serious concerns about continued incarceration despite eligibility for release.
A division bench comprising Justice Ravindra Maithani and Justice Siddharth Sah has directed the state administration to submit a comprehensive policy framework within one week outlining its approach to the release of long-term convicts. The court has scheduled the next hearing for May 18, signaling urgency in addressing the issue of delayed prisoner release.
The court’s intervention comes amid what it described as a persistent breakdown in the implementation of Supreme Court guidelines related to the timely release of convicts. While the state government informed the court that several inmates had already been released, it maintained that prisoners involved in serious offenses were still under review and that some cases required additional administrative clearance before release.
Also Read: Nitin Nabin Visits Uttarakhand To Review BJP Organisation And Election Plans
The matter first came under judicial scrutiny after the High Court took suo motu cognizance of the issue. Following inspections of various state prisons, the court identified 167 inmates whose sentences had reportedly ended but who remained in custody due to procedural and administrative delays. Although authorities later facilitated the release of some prisoners, a significant number categorized as “suspect” inmates continue to remain in jail pending further verification.
Petitioners have argued that the continued detention of such inmates amounts to a violation of fundamental rights, stating that many have remained incarcerated well beyond the completion of their sentences. They have also contended that repeated delays in implementing court directives reflect non-compliance by jail authorities and undermine Supreme Court orders mandating timely release of eligible prisoners.
Deputy Inspector General (Prisons) Dadhi Ram Maurya told TNIE that the department is compiling comprehensive data and reviewing cases in accordance with legal procedures. He added that more than 400 such prisoners have been released over the past four years, while efforts are ongoing to examine remaining cases. As the matter returns to court on May 18, the focus remains on balancing administrative scrutiny with constitutional safeguards for prisoners who have completed their sentences.
Also Read: US Credibility and Alliances at Risk If Taiwan Policy is Compromised: Report