Bihar’s Liquor Ban Repeal: Economic Boost or Social Disaster on the Horizon?

Prashant Kishor's Jan Suraaj Party has reignited a fiery debate in Bihar's political arena by reaffirming its commitment to repeal the state's eight-year-old liquor ban if elected to power in the upcoming assembly polls. The party argues that lifting the prohibition, imposed by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's government in April 2016, could reclaim nearly ₹28,000 crore in lost annual revenue from the alcohol trade. This windfall, they claim, would enable Bihar to secure loans totaling ₹5-6 lakh crore from international bodies like the World Bank and IMF, funding critical infrastructure and development projects. Kishor, the former poll strategist turned politician, has dramatically promised to revoke the ban "within the first hour" of assuming office, dismissing the current policy as a facade that has merely shifted liquor sales to illicit home deliveries.

The 2016 ban was championed by Kumar as a cornerstone of women's empowerment, targeting the scourge of alcohol-fueled domestic abuse and public disorder that disproportionately harmed families in rural Bihar. Initial surveys post-implementation revealed tangible benefits: a marked decline in street brawls, public intoxication, and alcohol-related violence. The policy evolved into a symbol of the Janata Dal (United)'s iron-fisted law-and-order stance, with routine seizures of liquor, drugs, and arms touted as evidence of robust governance. Even within the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), voices like Union Minister Jitan Ram Manjhi have called for a policy review, criticizing its uneven enforcement that jails poor tipplers for mere 250 ml consumption while allowing affluent smugglers to evade justice. Opposition Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav has urged open discussions, highlighting failures in curbing elite violations.

Scientific scrutiny paints a nuanced picture of the ban's impact. A May 2024 study in The Lancet Regional Health: Southeast Asia lauded its public health dividends, estimating a prevention of 2.4 million daily and weekly drinking episodes among men, reversing a pre-ban upward trend in alcohol use compared to neighboring states. The policy also curbed intimate partner violence by approximately 2.1 million cases, including emotional and sexual abuse against women, while contributing to a 5.6 percentage point drop in male overweight and obesity rates. However, downsides loom large: the ban has spawned a dangerous black market for "hooch," leading to fatal poisonings from adulterated liquor. Research by economists Aaditya Dar and Abhilasha Sahay suggests that diverting police resources to prohibition enforcement may have inadvertently spiked other crimes, while experts warn of heightened adolescent alcohol access, exacerbating mental health risks and risky behaviors.

Also Read: India's Inflation Plummets to 8-Year Low of 1.54% – Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

Bihar's prohibition saga mirrors experiences in other Indian states and abroad, where such policies yield mixed results. Gujarat's 1961 ban has slashed legal alcohol access and linked stricter regulations to fewer motor vehicle accidents and crimes against women, per a study by Dara Lee Luca and colleagues—yet it sustains a robust illicit trade and community-led fines in villages like Khambela.

Mizoram's 2018 reinstatement curbed some domestic violence but faltered on enforcement, inviting smuggling and youth vulnerabilities, as noted by Shivani Gupta. Globally, the U.S. Prohibition era (1920-1933) notoriously birthed speakeasies, bootlegging empires, and health crises from toxic brews, ultimately leading to repeal. In Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, religious bans persist amid thriving underground markets; Saudi Arabia's 2025 pilot liquor store for non-Muslim diplomats signals tentative reform under Vision 2030, though substance use among youth remains a concern at 7-8%.

As Bihar hurtles toward elections, Kishor's economic pitch clashes with the ban's social safeguards, forcing voters to grapple with a classic dilemma: prosperity versus protection. While Jan Suraaj envisions fiscal liberation, critics fear a return to pre-2016 chaos. The debate transcends politics, echoing timeless questions on governance, morality, and the unintended ripples of well-intentioned laws—leaving Bihar at a crossroads where the clink of glasses could either fund progress or fracture fragile gains.

Also Read: US Tariffs Threaten India’s Economic Surge: Growth Slashed to 6.5% in FY26