Supreme Court Raises Concerns Over Mamata Banerjee’s Role In I-PAC Investigation Case
Supreme Court criticises Mamata Banerjee over I-PAC investigation case, saying her actions put democracy in jeopardy.
The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday made strong observations in a case related to the Enforcement Directorate’s investigation involving the political consultancy firm Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC), in which West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has been accused of interfering with ongoing searches. The remarks came amid escalating political and legal tensions in the state ahead of elections.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has alleged that during searches conducted in early January at I-PAC offices and the residence of its founder Pratik Jain, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, along with state officials, entered the premises while the investigation was underway. The agency claims that certain electronic devices and documents were taken during the episode, which is part of an ongoing money laundering probe linked to the firm that works with the Trinamool Congress.
Expressing concern over the situation, the Supreme Court observed that a Chief Minister or any constitutional authority cannot interfere in an active investigation in a manner that could “put democracy in jeopardy.” The court stated that such actions blur the separation between state authority and investigative agencies, adding that constitutional framers would not have envisaged such conduct during ongoing probes.
Also Read: Mamata Banerjee Accuses Election Commission Of Stalling 4% DA Hike File
The state government, however, has maintained that the ED’s actions were politically motivated and intended to weaken the ruling Trinamool Congress ahead of elections. It has argued that the raids and subsequent allegations form part of a broader pattern of political targeting by central agencies, a claim that has frequently surfaced in disputes between opposition-ruled states and the Centre.
In a related development referenced by the court, the bench also took note of an incident in West Bengal’s Malda district where seven judicial officers were reportedly gheraoed for several hours by a large crowd during protests over alleged deletion of voter names under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The situation escalated enough to require intervention from the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court, who coordinated with senior state officials to secure their release.
The Supreme Court described the overall situation as “extraordinary,” emphasizing that courts cannot ignore ground realities involving administrative breakdowns or tensions affecting judicial officers. It noted that such incidents require careful judicial consideration, given their implications for governance, law enforcement, and the electoral process in the state.
Also Read: Dharmendra Pradhan Accuses Mamata Banerjee Government Of Corruption And Governance Failure
