SC Upholds Army Dismissal of Christian Officer for Refusing to Join Regimental Religious Rituals

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the dismissal of Lieutenant Samuel Kamalesan, a Christian officer in the Indian Army, who refused to participate in regimental religious ceremonies held at the Sarv Dharam Sthal, a place symbolizing multiple faiths within his unit. The verdict reinforces that while Article 25 guarantees freedom of religion, such rights are subject to restrictions in the Armed Forces under Article 33 to maintain discipline, operational effectiveness, and unit cohesion.

The Court observed that violations of religious freedom should be assessed based on essential tenets of a religion rather than individual feelings or personal interpretations. It held that Lieutenant Kamalesan, as a commanding officer leading troops from Sikh, Jat, and Rajput backgrounds, had an obligation to respect the collective faith of the majority he commanded. His refusal to enter the sanctum sanctorum, despite counsel from his faith’s pastor that no breach of religious practice would occur, was deemed an act of indiscipline incompatible with military service.

During proceedings, Chief Justice Surya Kant described Kamalesan’s conduct as "the grossest kind of indiscipline," emphasizing that personal religious beliefs may not override lawful commands essential to preserving the secular and disciplined character of the regiment. The Court noted that the army’s disciplinary framework expects officers to lead by example in fostering unity and morale.

Also Read: Hundreds of VVPAT Slips Found on Roadside in Samastipur, EC Assures No Threat to Bihar Polls

The petitioner's counsel argued that entering religious spaces of other faiths conflicted with his monotheistic Christian beliefs, but the Bench responded that essential features of Christianity do not forbid such presence, especially when advised otherwise by his pastor. The Court also stressed that military service entails unique obligations that may temper individual freedoms for the greater good of the force.

By refusing to interfere with the Delhi High Court’s earlier order, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the precedence of collective harmony and discipline in the armed forces over individual religious preferences, sending a strong message about the standards expected of military personnel in matters affecting unit cohesion and operational integrity.

Also Read: SC Pauses Karnataka High Court's 'Unworkable' Ticket Audit Rule for Multiplexes