Government Explains Stand Against Creamy Layer Principle For SC, ST Communities

The Centre has opposed extending the “creamy layer” principle to Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) reservations, telling the Supreme Court that affirmative action for these communities is based on historical and social disadvantages rather than economic status alone. The government argued that the concept of excluding better-off sections from reservation benefits has so far been applied only to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and cannot be directly extended to SC and ST categories. The submission was made before the Supreme Court while the Centre was responding to a plea seeking an income-based sub-quota within reserved categories.

The petition had raised questions about whether economically advanced members of reserved communities should continue receiving reservation benefits or whether a separate mechanism should be introduced to ensure greater access for the most disadvantaged sections within these groups. The government maintained that India’s reservation framework is not designed purely as an economic welfare measure. According to the Centre, reservations for SC and ST communities were introduced to address centuries of social exclusion, caste-based discrimination and historical disadvantages faced by these communities.

It argued that reducing the criteria only to financial status would overlook the broader constitutional objective behind providing representation and opportunities to historically marginalised groups. The Centre told the apex court that the “creamy layer” doctrine has been consistently applied in the context of OBC reservations. The principle was developed to prevent relatively advanced sections within backward classes from taking away benefits meant for those who remain socially and educationally disadvantaged. However, the government said that the same approach cannot automatically be applied to SC and ST communities because their reservation rights are linked to specific historical and constitutional considerations.

Also Read: Rahul Gandhi Addresses Student Protests, Education Crisis in Instagram AMA

The government further stated that any major change to the existing reservation policy, including the introduction of income-based preferences among reserved category beneficiaries, would require a detailed examination. It said such a decision could only be taken after a comprehensive review supported by empirical evidence, including socio-economic data of beneficiaries from reserved communities. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment had also stated in a response dated June 15, 2026, that the decision on extending the creamy layer principle to SC and ST categories rests with Parliament.

The ministry indicated that any alteration to the reservation structure would require legislative consideration rather than administrative action. The issue of applying the creamy layer principle to SC and ST reservations has remained a subject of legal and political debate. Supporters of the move argue that benefits should reach the most deprived sections within these communities, while opponents maintain that social discrimination and historical exclusion continue to affect members of SC and ST groups across economic backgrounds.

The Supreme Court has examined various aspects of reservation policy over the years, including questions related to equality, representation and the distribution of benefits among disadvantaged communities. The Centre’s latest submission reflects its position that reservations for SC and ST categories serve a broader purpose than economic upliftment alone and are aimed at correcting deep-rooted social inequalities. The government’s stand now places the focus on the constitutional and policy considerations involved in modifying reservation rules for SC and ST communities. Any future decision on the matter is expected to involve a wider debate involving lawmakers, courts, social groups and policymakers on how affirmative action can continue to meet its intended objectives.

Also Read: Congo Places 200 Passengers Under Quarantine After Ebola-Like Death