Dharmasthala Mystery: Complainant Moves to Withdraw Case
Sujata Bhat seeks to withdraw daughter’s disappearance complaint.
In a stunning development in the high-profile Dharmasthala case, Sujata Bhat, the primary complainant, expressed her intent to withdraw her complaint during a third consecutive day of questioning by the Special Investigation Team (SIT). Bhat had previously alleged that her daughter, Ananya, vanished from the Dharmasthala temple premises in 2003, sparking widespread attention and controversy. The SIT’s relentless probe has now raised questions about the veracity of her claims, with investigators noting inconsistencies in her statements.
During Friday’s interrogation, sources revealed that Bhat appeared visibly strained, struggling under the pressure of sustained questioning. Her latest statements contradicted earlier assertions of a larger conspiracy surrounding her daughter’s disappearance, leading SIT officials to suspect she may be obstructing the legal process. Bhat reportedly disclosed the names of individuals allegedly involved in the incident, but authorities have refrained from confirming details, stating that these claims are under verification. The investigation has taken a dramatic turn, with allegations surfacing that the narrative of the missing girl might have been fabricated, intensifying public and political scrutiny.
The Dharmasthala case has become a lightning rod for debate, with political parties trading barbs and the public closely monitoring developments. Legal experts emphasized that even if Bhat formally withdraws her complaint, the SIT is likely to continue its investigation due to the gravity of the allegations and the case’s progression into the judicial system. A senior police official indicated that the SIT is preparing an interim report, expected in the coming weeks, which could shed further light on the mysterious circumstances surrounding Ananya’s alleged disappearance.
Also Read: Dharmasthala Mystery: SIT Raids Activist Mahesh Shetty’s Residence in Ujire
As the probe deepens, the SIT remains focused on uncovering concrete evidence to substantiate or refute Bhat’s claims. The case’s outcome could have significant implications, not only for those directly involved but also for public trust in the judicial process, as Karnataka awaits answers in this gripping saga.
Also Read: Dharmasthala Mystery: 'Mass Burial' Whistleblower Arrested
