Congress Targets AAP’s Hindu Outreach, Questions Use Of Taxpayers’ Money In Punjab

Congress MP Dharamvira Gandhi has criticised the Bhagwant Mann-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Punjab over its religious programmes, questioning the use of public funds for initiatives aimed at promoting religious and cultural outreach. In a sharply worded Facebook post, Gandhi referred to the AAP leadership as "Kejri-Bhagwant & Co" and asked whether taxpayers' money should be spent on religious activities. His remarks have brought the government's outreach programmes under renewed political scrutiny and opened a debate over the role of the state in matters of religion.

Gandhi said his family, like other taxpayers, works and pays taxes with the expectation that government funds will be used to improve essential public services. He specifically cited healthcare, education, employment and infrastructure as areas where taxpayers expect public expenditure to be directed. Questioning the government's decision to organise or support religious programmes, he referred to initiatives including "Ek Shaam Shiv Ke Naam" and "Hamare Ram" in his criticism. He also raised objections to free pilgrimages to religious destinations such as Shri Khatu Shyam, Salasar, Haridwar, Rishikesh, Mathura, Vrindavan and Shri Hazur Sahib.

The Congress leader argued that religion is fundamentally a matter of individual faith and belief and maintained that the government should not promote or patronise one religion over another. According to Gandhi's argument, state institutions have a responsibility to remain even-handed when dealing with different religious communities. He warned that government-backed religious initiatives could potentially contribute to social divisions and encourage communalism. His comments therefore extend beyond criticism of individual programmes and raise a broader question about whether public resources should be used for religious outreach by an elected government.

Also Read: AAP-BJP Rivalry Intensifies Over Guru Ravidas Centre And Punjab's Dalit Voters

The issue comes as the Bhagwant Mann government and AAP have increasingly incorporated religious and cultural outreach into their public messaging in Punjab. Religious programmes and pilgrimage initiatives can have considerable political significance in a state with a diverse population and a strong religious and cultural identity. Supporters of such programmes can view them as efforts to facilitate access to places of faith or acknowledge cultural traditions, while critics can argue that public money should be directed primarily towards secular public services. Gandhi's comments reflect the latter position and place the expenditure and purpose of such initiatives under political scrutiny.

Gandhi's remarks have also drawn attention to the political response from Punjab's traditional parties. The Congress and the Shiromani Akali Dal have historically been major political forces in the state, but neither has so far made the AAP government's religious programmes a sustained political issue, according to the information available. The relative silence of the two parties stands out because questions surrounding religion, public expenditure and government patronage can become politically sensitive in Punjab. Gandhi's intervention could therefore put pressure on opposition parties to clarify their positions on the government's religious outreach.

At the centre of the dispute is the question of how governments should balance cultural and religious initiatives with the principle of equal treatment of all faiths and the broader priorities of public spending. Gandhi has argued that taxpayers' money should be used to strengthen essential services and that the state should not favour one religion. The AAP government's programmes, meanwhile, have become part of its wider public outreach. Whether the controversy develops into a larger political confrontation will depend on how the government, opposition parties and the wider public respond to the questions raised by the Congress MP.

For now, Gandhi's criticism has put a spotlight on programmes such as "Ek Shaam Shiv Ke Naam", "Hamare Ram" and government-supported pilgrimages. His central argument is that religion should remain a matter of personal faith and that public institutions should not promote one religious community over another. The controversy adds another layer to Punjab's political debate, where questions of governance, public spending, religious identity and communal harmony frequently intersect.

Also Read: Haryana CM Accuses Congress, AAP Of Failing To Protect Youth Interests