“Trump Lost Control of the War”: Senator Chris Murphy Criticises Trump’s Handling of Iran War

US Democratic Senator Chris Murphy has intensified his criticism of President Donald Trump, stating that the president has “lost control of the war” against Iran and is now operating in a “panic mode” as the conflict enters a more volatile phase.Murphy, a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is among a growing number of Democratic lawmakers expressing concern over the ongoing US-Israel military campaign in Iran, which has now stretched into its fourth week. The operation has sparked debate in Washington over its objectives, execution, and potential long-term consequences, particularly as the conflict shows signs of intensifying rather than de-escalating.

The senator’s remarks follow Trump’s recent warning that the United States could “obliterate” Iran’s power plants if Tehran fails to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply is transported. The threat has raised alarm among global observers, with concerns that any disruption in the strait could trigger sharp increases in energy prices and further destabilise the region.

Murphy has previously been critical of the administration’s approach, earlier describing the military operation as “Trump’s insane war.” His latest comments reflect mounting frustration among sections of the Democratic Party, who argue that the conflict risks entangling the United States in a prolonged and unpredictable military engagement. Critics have also warned that escalating rhetoric could reduce the chances of diplomatic resolution and increase the likelihood of broader regional involvement.

Also Read: Political Pressure Mounts On Trump Over Iran War Strategy And Fallout

The situation has prompted calls within Congress for greater oversight and clarity on the administration’s strategy. Lawmakers from both parties have raised questions about the legal framework underpinning the military action, as well as its alignment with broader US foreign policy goals. Some have urged the administration to engage more actively with allies and international institutions to prevent further escalation and explore diplomatic avenues.

Beyond Washington, the conflict is being closely monitored for its global implications, particularly in energy and trade. Analysts note that continued instability in the region could disrupt key shipping routes, strain international alliances, and exert upward pressure on global oil prices. Such developments could have ripple effects across economies, including increased inflation and supply chain disruptions.

Despite the criticism, the administration has maintained that its actions are aimed at safeguarding strategic interests and ensuring stability in critical regions. However, the growing political divide in Washington underscores the uncertainty surrounding the trajectory of the conflict. As the situation evolves, both policymakers and global observers remain focused on whether the crisis will escalate further or move toward a negotiated resolution.

Also Read: Report: Trump Told G7 Iran Was Near Surrender Before Khamenei Response