Trump Applies Venezuela Strategy to Iran, But Key Differences Loom Large

US President Donald Trump appears to be adapting tactics from the recent successful operation against Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro to pressure Iran, deploying what he describes as a larger naval “armada” near Iranian waters and issuing stern warnings to its leadership. Fresh from the commando-led seizure of Maduro—who now faces drug trafficking charges in New York—Trump has signaled readiness for swift, forceful action if Tehran does not comply with US demands, particularly regarding oil access and nuclear constraints.

The approach echoes his Venezuela playbook: rapid intervention, leadership targeting, and leveraging military presence to force compliance. Trump highlighted on social media that the fleet near Iran surpasses the one used in Venezuela, describing it as “ready, willing, and able to rapidly fulfill its mission, with speed and violence, if necessary.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently told a Senate committee that Iran’s clerical regime is at its weakest since the 1979 revolution, citing ongoing internal unrest.

However, experts stress sharp and fundamental differences that make Iran a far more complex and dangerous challenge. Unlike Venezuela’s centralized leadership, Iran’s power is diffuse, anchored by the elite Revolutionary Guards who have brutally suppressed recent mass protests. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, now 86, embodies resistance to the US, lives ascetically, and draws on a religious tradition that venerates martyrdom—leaving little room for exile deals or easy cracks in the system.

Also Read: Trump Deploys Carrier Strike Group to Middle East, Heightens Iran Tensions

Militarily, Iran presents steeper hurdles. While US forces executed a quick in-and-out operation in coastal Caracas, Tehran lies deep inland, backed by battle-hardened defenses forged through decades of conflict, including the 1980s Iran-Iraq War and recent Israeli strikes. Analysts warn that a “decapitation strike” could trigger unpredictable second- and third-order consequences, potentially unleashing chaos inside Iran or rallying support for the regime.

Trump’s stated goal with Iran focuses on imposing strict limits on its nuclear program and missiles rather than outright regime change—a contrast to the Venezuela model. Observers note that the Maduro operation has complicated Iran’s long-held assumption that the US would avoid targeting leaders due to escalation fears, serving more as a strategic signal than a direct template. Gulf Arab allies, despite their animosity toward Tehran, remain wary of any move that could spark a wider regional conflict and threaten their stability.

The situation underscores the limits of applying Latin American tactics to the Middle East, where historical, geographical, and ideological factors create markedly higher stakes.

Also Read: Trump Ignites New World Order Buzz with Alliance Shifts