Article 5 Of Iran-US MoU Explains Safe Passage Clause Behind Hormuz Unrest

Fresh tensions have emerged between the United States and Iran just weeks after the two countries signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at ending months of conflict and restoring stability in the Middle East. The latest confrontation centres on Article 5 of the interim agreement, which governs the reopening and management of commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Following a series of maritime incidents and retaliatory military strikes over the weekend, both Washington and Tehran have accused each other of violating the terms of the agreement, raising concerns over the future of the fragile peace process.

Article 5 of the MoU focuses on ensuring the safe passage of commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most strategically important maritime routes. Under the agreement, Iran pledged to use its best efforts to facilitate safe navigation between the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman for an initial 60-day period. The provision also requires the removal of mines and other military or technical obstacles within 30 days, while calling for consultations with Oman and other Gulf nations to determine the future administration of the waterway in accordance with international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states.

The disagreement stems from differing interpretations of how Article 5 should be implemented. The United States maintains that commercial shipping should resume under internationally recognised navigation practices, with vessels free to use routes considered safest, including channels closer to Oman's territorial waters. Iran, however, argues that the agreement recognises its authority to oversee navigation within the Strait during the clearance period and insists that ships continue using the northern shipping corridor located within Iranian territorial waters. These conflicting interpretations have become the central point of contention behind the renewed military exchanges.

Also Read: US Reportedly Uses Ship-To-Ship Oil Transfers Near Hormuz Edge

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has stated that the Strait of Hormuz remains under Iran's operational management during the 30-day clearance process and warned that any unilateral intervention could delay the reopening of the waterway. Meanwhile, defence analysts and regional experts remain divided over which side bears responsibility for the latest escalation. Some argue that Washington is seeking to reinterpret the agreement after signing it, while others contend that Iran's insistence on controlling shipping operations contradicts the principle of freedom of navigation through an internationally significant maritime corridor.

The Strait of Hormuz carries nearly one-fifth of the world's oil supply, making stability in the region critical for global energy markets and international trade. Although both the United States and Iran have reaffirmed their commitment to reopening the waterway and resuming negotiations, the latest hostilities highlight the fragility of the interim agreement. Diplomatic efforts are expected to continue in an attempt to clarify the implementation of Article 5, restore confidence between the two sides, and prevent further disruptions to one of the world's busiest and most strategically important shipping lanes.

Also Read: Iran Foreign Ministry Confirms Proposed Fees For Hormuz Maritime Transit