Western Nations Back Palestine: Symbolic or Meaningless?

As the United Nations General Assembly convenes on September 23, 2025, the recognition of Palestinian statehood is set to take center stage, with the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia recently joining approximately 150 of the 193 UN member states in acknowledging Palestine as a sovereign state. This wave of recognition, expected to grow in the coming days with countries like France and Portugal, marks a significant diplomatic victory for Palestinians advocating for an independent, self-governed nation. However, as Maha Nassar, a scholar of modern Palestinian history, notes, such symbolic gestures have historically fallen short of delivering tangible statehood, raising questions about their true impact.

The push for Palestinian statehood traces back to the 1967 Six-Day War, when Israel seized control of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip. Unlike after the 1948 war, Israel did not grant citizenship to Palestinians in these territories, instead imposing a permit system that tightly regulates daily life—from harvesting olives to working or worshipping. These military orders, many still in place, underscore the lack of autonomy for Palestinians. Israel’s policies, including banning public displays of the Palestinian flag, have long sought to suppress Palestinian national identity, as exemplified by former Prime Minister Golda Meir’s 1969 claim that Palestinians did not exist as a distinct people.

Palestinian nationalism gained momentum in the late 1960s, with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) formalizing the call for a secular, democratic state in 1969. The PLO’s 1974 Ten-Point Plan shifted toward seeking a national authority in any liberated part of historic Palestine, balancing diplomacy with resistance. By 1988, during the First Intifada, the PLO declared independence for a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, a move authored by poet Mahmoud Darwish and proclaimed by Yasser Arafat. While symbolic, this declaration united Palestinians in exile and the occupied territories, galvanizing hope for international recognition of their national aspirations.

Also Read: India Urges UN to Curb Pakistan-Based Terror Groups Operating in Afghanistan

The 1988 declaration, however, was a compromise, covering only 22% of historic Palestine and effectively relinquishing claims to the rest. While many Global South nations swiftly recognized Palestine, Western powers, including the United States, rejected it. The Oslo Accords in the 1990s, intended as a step toward a two-state solution, instead created the Palestinian Authority with limited powers, leaving Israel in control of land, resources, and borders. Critics like Mahmoud Darwish and Edward Said viewed Oslo as a flawed framework that entrenched Palestinian dependency rather than fostering true sovereignty.

The Second Intifada (2000–2005) and growing disillusionment with Oslo prompted renewed efforts for international recognition. In 2012, the UN General Assembly upgraded Palestine to a “nonmember observer state,” granting access to bodies like the International Criminal Court. Yet, meaningful sovereignty requires UN Security Council approval, where the U.S. veto remains a formidable barrier. Despite recent recognitions by Western nations, critics argue these moves are symbolic gestures that sidestep the harder task of addressing Israel’s actions, particularly in light of a UN report labeling Israel’s Gaza operations as genocide.

While the UK and other Western nations’ recognition of Palestine signals a shift, it does little to alter the reality on the ground, where occupation and restrictions persist. For Palestinians, these diplomatic wins are bittersweet—decades of symbolic breakthroughs have yet to translate into a sovereign state. As the UN meetings approach, the world watches to see if these recognitions will spark meaningful change or remain gestures lost in the complexities of geopolitics.

Also Read: Japan and South Korea Clash at UN Over Wartime Sexual Slavery