Supreme Court Restores POCSO Case Against Headmistress For Not Reporting Abuse

The Supreme Court has restored criminal proceedings against the headmistress of a school in Guwahati, Assam, ruling that a person who receives a direct complaint of sexual assault from a child cannot conduct a private inquiry before deciding whether to report the matter to police. The court said failure to report such information can attract prosecution under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

A bench of Justices Manoj Misra and KV Viswanathan set aside orders of a trial court and the Gauhati High Court that had discharged the headmistress from prosecution. The case concerns an eight-year-old student who allegedly accused a senior student of sexual assault. The Supreme Court held that credible information received directly from a child is sufficient to trigger the mandatory reporting obligation under Section 19 of the POCSO Act.

According to the prosecution, the child informed her elder sister, the school’s Head Girl and eventually the headmistress about the alleged assault. Instead of reporting the complaint to police, the headmistress allegedly conducted her own verification, examined the child, questioned the accused student and concluded that nothing had happened. She is also accused of asking students not to disclose the incident.

Also Read: Supreme Court Spares Petitioner After He Abuses Chief Justice, Throws Papers

Rejecting the defence, the Supreme Court said the POCSO Act does not permit individuals to investigate or verify allegations privately before informing the authorities. The bench said allowing such inquiries could delay official action, lead to the disappearance of crucial evidence and expose children to further harm. Any investigation into whether an offence actually occurred must begin only after the complaint has been reported.

The court also held that the lower courts had effectively conducted a “mini-trial” while considering the discharge application instead of determining whether the prosecution material disclosed a prima facie case. Proceedings were restored only against the headmistress because she had allegedly received the complaint directly from the child. The discharge of the principal, teachers and hostel warden was upheld due to a lack of material showing direct knowledge.

The Supreme Court clarified that the victim’s sister, friend and the school’s Head Girl, who were minors at the time, could not be prosecuted for failing to report the alleged offence because the POCSO Act exempts children from such criminal liability. Under Section 21, failure to report an offence as required can be punished with imprisonment of up to six months, a fine or both. The victim’s mother’s appeal was partly allowed.

Also Read: SC Schedules July 13 Hearing On Pleas Seeking CBI Investigation Into Ram Temple Donations