Delhi BMW Crash: Accused Sent to Custody, Bail Plea Pending

Delhi court has remanded 38-year-old Gaganpreet Kaur, the woman accused of driving the BMW involved in a fatal accident, to two days of judicial custody. The incident, which claimed the life of a senior Finance Ministry official and left his wife gravely injured, has sparked widespread outrage and questions about the mishandling of the aftermath.

Duty Magistrate Akanksha Singh made the decision after Kaur was presented before her at her residence, noting that no further custodial interrogation was necessary at this stage. Represented by senior advocate Vikas Pahwa, Kaur has also filed a bail application, prompting the court to issue notices to both the Delhi Police and the victim's family. Responses are due by September 17, when the matter will be heard in detail, adding another layer of suspense to this unfolding saga.

The tragedy struck on a busy Sunday afternoon around 1:30 p.m. on Delhi's Ring Road in Dhaula Kuan. Navjot Singh, a 52-year-old Deputy Secretary in the Department of Economic Affairs, was riding his motorcycle home from Bangla Sahib Gurdwara with his wife, Sandeep Kaur, when their vehicle was allegedly struck by Kaur's speeding BMW. Singh succumbed to his injuries, while his wife suffered severe trauma, including multiple fractures, and continues to receive medical care.

Also Read: Delhi Court Cancels NBWs Against Ex-Official Vikash Yadav

Kaur, a resident of Gurugram and wife of businessman Parikshit Makkar, was traveling with her husband, two children, and a maid at the time. Following the crash, she was arrested on charges including culpable homicide not amounting to murder under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, along with sections for rash driving, endangering lives, and tampering with evidence. Police officials revealed that Kaur, after being treated for her own injuries, was discharged from the hospital and taken into custody on Monday.

What has fueled public fury and investigative scrutiny is the peculiar choice of hospital post-accident. Instead of rushing the victims to one of the several nearby medical facilities in the bustling Dhaula Kuan area, Kaur transported Singh and his wife over 19 kilometers to Nulife Hospital in GTB Nagar, north Delhi—a facility reportedly owned by one of her relatives. Singh was pronounced dead on arrival, and his family has accused Kaur and her husband of receiving preferential treatment at the hospital, delaying critical care for the more seriously injured couple.

In her defense, Kaur claimed she panicked in the chaos and could only recall Nulife Hospital, where her children had been treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Sandeep Kaur's statement to the police paints a harrowing picture: she reportedly begged the accused couple to head to the nearest hospital as her husband lay unconscious and bleeding, but her pleas went unheeded. This has led to suspicions of ulterior motives, with police probing potential tampering of medical records related to Kaur's own treatment.

Advocate Pahwa vehemently contested the police's push for custody, highlighting inconsistencies in the official narrative. He pointed out a 10-hour delay in filing the FIR, which he argued undermined the case's credibility. Referencing a press conference by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) and CCTV footage, Pahwa described the accident as an unfortunate sequence: the BMW first collided with a divider on a curve, its rear then striking the motorcycle, which subsequently hit a DTC bus. "This was not intentional malice," Pahwa argued before the judge. "My client was traumatized herself, injured, and did everything in her power to get medical aid for the victims. Arresting her without need for recovery or identification is unjust."

He further emphasized that Kaur lacked any foreknowledge that her actions would lead to death, portraying her as a compassionate individual who prioritized help amid the panic. "Taking them to a known hospital wasn't an 'oblique purpose'—it was a split-second decision in shock," Pahwa added, challenging the prosecution's portrayal of events as premeditated or evasive.

The case has broader implications, raising concerns about road safety in Delhi's high-traffic zones, the accountability of affluent drivers, and potential biases in emergency responses. Under the invoked sections—281 for rash driving, 125B for endangering safety, 105 for culpable homicide, and 238 for evidence tampering—Kaur faces serious penalties if convicted. As investigations continue, including reviews of hospital records and witness statements, the victim's family demands swift justice, echoing calls for stricter enforcement against reckless driving.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of life on India's roads, where a momentary lapse can lead to irreversible loss. With the bail hearing looming, all eyes are on the court to see if Kaur walks free or if the scales of justice tip toward holding her accountable for the heartbreaking chain of events.

Also Read: Rs 9 Crore GST Scam Lands MD in Jail